SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION: Prior to closure of the water-control structure, the pilot restoration watershed was characterized by low water tables and the absence of surface outflows from middle summer through October. Large rainstorms intermittently produced high discharges, but only for very short durations. Rainstorms are more frequent in spring and early summer, and because the water table was near the surface during those seasons, very night discharges were sometimes generated that lasted for several days. When the water-control structure was closed in late May, 1996, the water table rose to its maximum attainable elevation within just a few days. Even at the time, however, only about seven percent of the entire watershed was flooded, because the north berm is lower than most of the interior of the watershed. For several weeks, the area of the pool remained almost constant, but the pool then dried up when the regional water-table aquifer experienced a steep decline in middle summer. Several weeks later, the pool was reestablished during a brief stormy period and it remained for several weeks, but then dried up again when the regional water table once again declined. There findings demonstrate an important link that exists between restoration activities and the regional water table. Placement of water-control structures in subareas is probably incapable of restoring marsh conditions even in small areas so long as the regional water table experiences large fluctuations in elevation. Large declines of the regional water table occur because discharges through Derby Ditch occur constantly, so that the water-table aquifer is being dewatered during periods when rainfall does not occur for several weeks. Such conditions occur frequently. Future restoration measures may require placement of a water-control structure in Derby Ditch, itself. The level could be fixed to a level would retain more groundwater during dry periods of summer, but would not pose any threat of flooding in developed areas during heavy rainfalls.
Olyphant, G. A., Feuerstein, E. W., Harper, D. 1997, Hydrologic monitoring associated with pilot restoration of part of the Great Marsh, Indiana Dunes National Lakeshore: Indiana Geological Survey Open-File Study 97-18, 14 p.
Notes: Publications in the Indiana Geological Survey Open-File series have been inconsistently named using a variety of series titles including "Open-File Report," "Open-File Map," and "Open-File Study." Prior to 1994, a publication in this series was generally referred to as an "Open-File Report" (but not always). To help reduce confusion created by these inconsistencies, the IGS now refers to every publication in the Open-File series as an "Open-File Study." To be entirely correct in writing a bibliographic reference for a publication, one should use the series name and number that appears on the publication itself.
You may also like:
Can't find what you're looking for? Feel free to contact us directly:
Publication Sales Office
Indiana Geological and Water Survey
420 N. Walnut St.
Bloomington, IN 47404
IGS Return Policy
All sales are final. Materials may not be returned after they have been accepted by the customer. Any discrepencies in mail orders must be reported to IGWS within 10 days of receipt of order.
The Indiana Geological and Water Survey will refund the purchase price and sales tax of products if returned with the original sales receipt within 10 days of receipt of order. Refunds will be issued with the same method of payment as indicated on the original receipt except for cash purchases, which will be refunded by check. Items must be returned in the same condition as purchased. Refunds on digital products and services are not allowed, except for defective media such as CD-ROMs, flash drives, and so on. The customer is responsible for paying shipping costs to return items.