Item Number: OFS94-16

ABSTRACT: The internal architecture and timing of development were determined for 78 beach ridges within the Thompson and Manistique embayments southwest of Manistique, Michigan. The elevations of the foreshore sediments recovered in vibracores of the lakeward margin of each ride were used to determine the relative elevation of Lake Michigan when each ridge formed. To determine the age of the ridges and the timing of their development, 25 peat samples were dated from basal wetland sediments between ridges. A least squares regression was calculated through these dates to reduce scatter and to assign ages to unsampled wetlands. It is assumed in this study that the age of the base of the wetland is a minimum age for the ridge lakeward of it. Ridges were found to have formed during two periods, between 4,300 and 2,700 calendar years before present (B.P.), and between 1,800 and 1,000 B.P. Foreshore elevations show an overall lowering of relative lake level of 25 feet between 4,300 and 2,700 B.P. The Thompson embayment contains no ridges which formed between 2,700 and 1,800 B.P. Ridges during this period were either removed by high lake levels at some time between 1,800 or 2,700 B.P. or never formed. From 1,800 to 1,000 B.P. lake level dropped and additional 10 feet before beginning a long-term fall of 3 feet to current lake level. Between 4,300 and 1,000 B.P. individual beach ridges formed about every 30 to 35 years. Foreshore elevations indicate a well-defined grouping of four to five beach ridges approximately every 150 years. After 1,000 B.P. the shoreline of the Thompson embayment has straightened and accommodation space in the embayment has been removed, therefore it is unlikely that beach ridges after this point will be preserved. Although 3 beach ridges have formed immediately landward of the shore in the last 75 years, these are ephermeral features and will be removed fromt eh preserved record following the next high lake level event. Foreshore elevations recorded in the Thompson embayment are considerably higher than the long-term historical average of lake-level for Lake Michigan, suggesting that this embayment is far above the isostatic zero isoline for the Port Huron outlet for Lakes Michigan and Huron.

Baedke, S. , Thompson, T. A. 1994, Preliminary report of Late Holocene lake-level variation in northern Lake Michigan: part 2: Indiana Geological Survey Open-File Study 94-16, 13 p., 6 fig.

Notes: Publications in the Indiana Geological Survey Open-File series have been inconsistently named using a variety of series titles including "Open-File Report," "Open-File Map," and "Open-File Study." Prior to 1994, a publication in this series was generally referred to as an "Open-File Report" (but not always). To help reduce confusion created by these inconsistencies, the IGS now refers to every publication in the Open-File series as an "Open-File Study." To be entirely correct in writing a bibliographic reference for a publication, one should use the series name and number that appears on the publication itself.


You may also like:

Keywords: sedimentology, lake level, Holocene, beach ridge, strandplain

Can't find what you're looking for? Feel free to contact us directly:

Publication Sales Office
Indiana Geological and Water Survey
420 N. Walnut St.
Bloomington, IN 47404
812-855-7636 (phone)
812-855-2862 (fax)

IGS Return Policy

All sales are final. Materials may not be returned after they have been accepted by the customer. Any discrepencies in mail orders must be reported to IGWS within 10 days of receipt of order.

The Indiana Geological and Water Survey will refund the purchase price and sales tax of products if returned with the original sales receipt within 10 days of receipt of order. Refunds will be issued with the same method of payment as indicated on the original receipt except for cash purchases, which will be refunded by check. Items must be returned in the same condition as purchased. Refunds on digital products and services are not allowed, except for defective media such as CD-ROMs, flash drives, and so on. The customer is responsible for paying shipping costs to return items.