Type section: The Harrodsburg Limestone was named by Hopkins and Siebenthal (1897, p. 296-297) for the town of Harrodsburg in southern Monroe County, Indiana (Rexroad, 1986). The type section in the NE¼SW¼ sec. 32, T. 7 N., R. 1 W., on the north bluff of Judah Creek is poorly exposed (Rexroad, 1986).
History of usage:
The lower part of the Harrodsburg was divided into the Leesville and Guthrie Creek Members by Stockdale (1939) (Rexroad, 1986). These units were reduced to the status of beds by Nicoll and Rexroad (1975).
The Harrodsburg Limestone is dominantly a well-cemented bioclastic calcarenite and calcirudite but includes some dolostone, shale, very argillaceous limestone, and minor amounts of chert (Rexroad, 1986). An impure unit, which includes geodes and silicified material, is present in some places from 1 to 11 ft (0.3 to 3.4 m) above the base of the formation (Rexroad, 1986). Geodes and chert are uncommon elsewhere in the Harrodsburg (Rexroad, 1986). Shale is present in places in beds as much as 2 ft (0.6 m) thick. In the upper part of the formation some lenses nearly 20 ft (6 m) thick are almost identical in lithology to common Salem lithologies, although in general they are more firmly cemented (Rexroad, 1986). The bioclastic part of the limestone is dominated by crinoid fragments and contains some bryozoans and brachiopods (Rexroad, 1986). In the upper part of the Harrodsburg thick beds of fenestrate-bryozoan coquina are present (Rexroad, 1986).
The northern boundary of the Harrodsburg is obscured by Pennsylvanian overlap where the Mansfield Formation locally overlies it unconformably (Rexroad, 1986). Otherwise, the Harrodsburg is overlain conformably and gradationally by the Salem Limestone, and it conformably overlies the Ramp Creek Formation (Rexroad, 1986).
Conodonts show that the Harrodsburg is the age equivalent of the upper three-fourths of the Warsaw Shale and the lower part of the Salem Limestone of the Mississippi Valley sequence (Nicoll and Rexroad, 1975, p. 16). The Harrodsburg is also considered to be partly equivalent to the Warsaw Limestone of Kentucky (Shaver, 1984), a name that had often been applied directly in Indiana as late as the time of P. B. Stockdale's work (Rexroad, 1986). According to Lineback (1966), the Harrodsburg is the upper member of the Ullin Limestone, which derived its name from southern Illinois (Rexroad, 1986).
The following petroleum fields have produced oil from the Harrodsburg Limestone (Mississippian) in Indiana: Ash Iron Springs, Birdseye, Black River Consolidated, Chrisney South, Eckerty, Folsomville, Ford South, Francisco Consolidated, Fulda West, Gentryville Consolidated, Grandview North Consolidated, Heilman South, Huntingburg South, Monroe City Consolidated, Newtonville Consolidated, Owensville Consolidated, Princeton North Consolidated, Santa Claus, Selvin East, Siberia East, Spencer Consolidated, Stewartsville Consolidated, Troy, Union-Bowman Consolidated, and Washington (Cazee, 2004).
Regional Indiana usage:
Illinois Basin (COSUNA 11)
Lower Harrodsburg Limestone, Upper Harrodsburg Limestone
Geologic Map Unit Designation:
Note: Hansen (1991, p. 52) in Suggestions to authors of the reports of the United States Geological Survey noted that letter symbols for map units are considered to be unique to each geologic map and that adjacent maps do not necessarily need to use the same symbols for the same map unit. Therefore, map unit abbreviations in the Indiana Geologic Names Information System should be regarded simply as recommendations.
COSUNA areas and regional terminology
Names for geologic units vary across Indiana. The Midwestern Basin and Arches Region COSUNA chart (Shaver, 1984) was developed to strategically document such variations in terminology. The geologic map (below left) is derived from this chart and provides an index to the five defined COSUNA regions in Indiana. The regions are generally based on regional bedrock outcrop patterns and major structural features in Indiana. (Click the maps below to view more detailed maps of COSUNA regions and major structural features in Indiana.)
COSUNA areas and numbers that approximate regional bedrock outcrop patterns and major structural features in Indiana.
Major tectonic features that affect bedrock geology in Indiana.
Hansen, W. R., 1991, Suggestions to authors of the reports of the United States Geological Survey (7th ed.): Washington, D.C., U.S. Geological Survey, 289 p.
Hopkins, T. C., and Siebenthal, C. E., 1897, The Bedford Oolitic Limestone: Indiana Department of Geology and Natural Resources Annual Report 21, p. 289-427.
Lineback, J. A., 1966, Deep-water sediments adjacent to the Borden Siltstone (Mississippian) delta in southern Illinois: Illinois State Geological Survey Circular 401, 48 p.
Rexroad, C. B., 1986, Harrodsburg Limestone, in Shaver, R. H., Ault, C. H., Burger, A. M., Carr, D. D., Droste, J. B., Eggert, D. L., Gray, H. H., Harper, Denver, Hasenmueller, N. R., Hasenmueller, W. A., Horowitz, A. S., Hutchison, H. C., Keith, B. D., Keller, S. J., Patton, J. B., Rexroad, C. B., and Wier, C. E., Compendium of Paleozoic rock-unit stratigraphy in Indiana–a revision: Indiana Geological Survey Bulletin 59, p. 57-59.
Shaver, R. H., coordinator, 1984, Midwestern basin and arches region–correlation of stratigraphic units in North America (COSUNA): American Association of Petroleum Geologists Correlation Chart Series.
Stockdale, P. B., 1939, Lower Mississippian rocks of east-central interior (U.S.): Geological Society of America Special Paper 22, 248 p.
For additional information, contact:
Nancy Hasenmueller (email@example.com)Date last revised: March 11, 2021